Friday, January 22, 2010

Exploding Dreams?

In Langston Hughes’s poem “Harlem” he begins by asking “what happens to a dream deferred?” Hughes starts the poem off with a question. As we read through the poem we notice that the majority of the poem is questions, all of which are rhetorical except the first one. The reason the first question is not rhetorical is because Hughes wants the reader to ask that question throughout the reading of the poem. The first question also serves the purpose of giving the reader context to what the following questions are referring to.

Hughes continues the poem with asking a series of four questions broken off in their own stanza. He puts these questions in their own stanza because they are all rhetorical questions asking similar things. The questions follow the order of, “Does it dry …. Like a raisin?... Fester like a sore?... Stink like rotten meat?... Crust and sugar over like a syrupy sweet?” With the exception of the last of the four questions, the order of the questions mimics situations in which something is gone for good. A dream that dries like a raisin in the sun in still there regardless of the fact shriveled and its appeal is gone. A dream like a festering sore is something very repulsive, a dream one wouldn’t want to touch, but with time a sore heals. Rotten meat, on the other hand, infers a dream that has gone completely bad and should probably be thrown away, but it still does exist no matter how disgusting it is. This progression also mimics a progression of time, a raisin dries quicker than a sore takes to fester, and a festering sore will cease before meat goes bad. Hughes organizes these three questions in this manner specifically to show the longer a dream exists, the more repulsive the dream becomes. Hughes finishes the stanza with the sugar question. Hughes uses this question to show that some people believe that the longer a dream exists, the more appealing it gets.
Hughes finishes the poem with one last question. This question is isolated in its own stanza and is also italicized. The question asks “…or does [the dream] explode?” Referring back to the progression above where the longer a dream exists the more gone it becomes, Hughes presents this question last because, in his opinion, dreams that exists for too long are irretrievable.

Directly before this question Hughes presents his only non-question in the poem. This immediate switch from statement to italicized question tells the reader that the last question plays the most importance in the poem. Furthermore Hughes is telling the reader that this rhetorical question is his own conclusion upon what actually happens to dreams deferred. And thus the reader can believe that Hughes’s opinion on dreams that remain unattained will be completely obliterated and destroyed.

3 comments:

  1. You provided a thorough explanation of your opinion on the hidden meanings or reasons that Langston Hughes attached to each of his individual questions in Harlem, which is great.
    While you provided your interpretation to each question, I think you forgot to bridge your explanations like the way the poet links his questions in order to deliver effectiveness and meaning of the poem as a whole.

    I suggest that all of your ideas should be connected somehow, like putting pieces of puzzle together to yield a fuller image. You could link up your explanations so that they all point toward one direction.

    Lastly, I disagree when you wrote "Hughes is telling the reader that this rhetorical question is his own conclusion up what actually happens to dreams deferred." It's a little bit vague. More or less, it's his wonder. Hughes didn't conclude any thing. As he wandered, he just wondered if a dream explode or die when it's being hang or put on hold. Overall, you have a quite a writing!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really like your blog entry. You provide lots of details and your analysis of the poem is clear.

    In your blog, you compared the object of each rhetorical question to the passage of time. I had never thought about it in that sense.

    In your last paragraph, you state that the reader can infer that dreams will be destroyed. I disagree, I don't think the reader can infer this, rather the reader is just questioning what actually happens.

    Overall, great job.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While I’m not sure I completely understand your explanation of the order of the rhetorical questions in the middle, I like your analysis of the transition between the statement and the final question. I think, as you said, the switch from question, to statement, back to question, intensifies the meaning of the last question. Before reading this blog, I was confused as to the purpose of that switch, but now I agree that this allows us to interpret the final question as Hughes’s personal conclusion to the first question because of your interesting input.

    ReplyDelete